IMF affirms Senegal’s sovereignty over debt choices as Eurobond prices weaken.

The International Monetary Fund reiterated that any decision to restructure Senegal’s obligations remains a sovereign choice of the government, after discussions on options to address the country’s significant debt vulnerabilities and a suspended program, as the nation’s Eurobonds extended losses amid policy uncertainty for investors.

The IMF confirmed it held talks with Senegalese authorities during a staff mission to Dakar that concluded last week, reviewing policy options to tackle “significant debt vulnerabilities” and emphasizing its advisory role rather than prescribing outcomes, with a spokesperson stating the choice and specific nature of debt operations remain sovereign decisions for Senegal. The Fund’s $$1.8$$ billion dollar support package was frozen last year following the new government’s disclosure of hidden liabilities now estimated above $$\$11$$ billion, with Prime Minister Ousmane Sonko asserting over the weekend that officials had pressed for a restructuring—an option the government rejects—which triggered a sell-off in the country’s international bonds on Monday.

On Tuesday, the 2031 bond fell by $$0.7$$ cents to bid at $$71.77$$ cents on the dollar, while the euro‑denominated 2028 shed $$0.65$$ euro cents to bid at $$79$$, leaving the curve near July lows, according to Tradeweb data cited in the report. The IMF underscored that securing a financing program requires a credible path to debt sustainability, while the government’s August plan pledged to fund $$90\%$$ of a new recovery initiative from domestic resources and avoid further borrowing, even as fiscal conditions remain strained.

A Tellimer note cited in the report warned that rejecting restructuring narrows Senegal’s options to close a wide deficit and manage debt now estimated at $$132\%$$ of GDP, implying heavier reliance on domestic markets and spending cuts that could elevate social tensions, according to analyst Stuart Culverhouse.

The report contextualized regional precedents—Zambia, Ghana, and Ethiopia’s post‑2020 restructurings and Kenya’s costly tax‑led adjustment that sparked protests—highlighting why overhauls remain politically unpalatable, while NYU’s Abdoulaye Ndiaye cautioned that Senegal cannot wait for all governance reforms to finish before securing a new IMF arrangement

AnalysisBy reaffirming Senegal’s decision‑making primacy, the IMF preserves program optionality while shifting market focus to whether authorities can present a credible consolidation plan that stabilizes debt dynamics without a formal restructuring, a balance that will shape near‑term risk premia and investor confidence in the Eurobond curve.

Absent external relief, heavier domestic financing could raise local yields, crowd out private credit, and heighten rollover risk, whereas deeper expenditure rationalization may test social tolerance and policy durability, all of which investors will price into spreads and auction outcomes. Conversely, a roadmap that anchors primary balance improvements, improves debt transparency, and sequences reforms with targeted concessional support could reopen program traction and reduce funding costs, though execution risks remain elevated given the reported debt stock and budget gap.

Regional experience indicates that drawn‑out restructurings can weigh on growth and market access, yet delaying decisive measures can also compound costs, placing a premium on timely policy clarity, credible data, and stakeholder communication to stabilize expectations.

The immediate priority is policy clarity: either deliver a detailed, time‑bound path to debt sustainability that reassures markets without restructuring, or recalibrate strategy to secure program financing on terms that mitigate fiscal risk and social strain.

‍